Lansweeper implemented a new release model for our 9.x product releases, called “Continuous Delivery.” Using this method, we delivered smaller subsets of features to customers at a higher frequency, which enabled us to collect feedback about the new features earlier. What do you think? How does a member of staff see the whole thing? Are they aware of the problem, if there is one? Maybe we're just an individual case, but that's why it's supposed to be an open discussion. I would like to see the pace of development slowed down again and more time spent on quality assurance. Problems since Linux software is scanned. Introduction of driver scans and afterwards the message is patched in the function that it requires a lot of performance.

Introduction of new scan items and associated extremely long scan runtimes No automatic continuation of deployments I've never had as many problems as I've had in the last few months. However, for a few months now I have had the feeling, that new functions are being implemented here with unnecessary pressure without really sending them through quality control and that the tests are being shifted more and more onto the customers. I could usually rely on the fact that there were no problems when I immediately installed the update in our productive system.

I have been using Lansweeper for 5-7 years now (how time flies) and have always been very satisfied with the quality of updates and new features. My English is not the best, but I wanted to have a look in the forum and maybe start a general discussion about the quality of Lansweeper.

Download lansweeper 10.0.2